Monthly Archive for April, 2010

Climate Change Imperils the State of the Planet–Will the World Act?

From David Biello, Scientific American

More than 100 countries have signed on to the Copenhagen Accord—the nonbinding agreement to combat climate change hastily agreed to this past December at a summit of world leaders. As signatories, the countries agree to cut greenhouse gas emissions to keep global average temperatures from warming more than 2 degrees Celsius. The countries that have signed up to date represent more than 80 climate-change-imperils-state-of-the-planet_11percent of the global emissions of such heat-trapping gases.

“Climate change is one of the most important challenges humanity faces today,” said Mexico President Felipe Calderón Hinojosa via videoconference from Mexico City at the State of the Planet gathering at Columbia University hosted by its Earth Institute on March 25. “This is urgent, we need to act now as countries and as governments.”

As part of signing on, countries also listed their national goals for emission reductions. Mexico, for its part, pledged to cut 50 million metric tons of greenhouse gas emissions annually by 2012. The U.S. pledged to reduce emissions by 4 percent below 1990 levels, pending legislation, whereas China promised cuts of 40 to 45 percent of the total CO2 per unit of economic production, so-called carbon intensity. And it will fall to Calderón and his colleagues in the Mexican government as hosts of the next climate change negotiation meetings in Cancún this November to continue progress toward an international, binding agreement. After all, without a legally binding treaty there will be no accountability on greenhouse gas emissions, warned United Nations Secretary General Ban Ki-moon at the conference.

To Read More…

“Goddess” Glacier Melting in War-Torn Kashmir

kashmir-himalaya-glacier-melt_16987_600x4502From Rebecca Byerly, National Geographic News

This story is part of a special series that explores the global water crisis. For more clean water news, photos, and information, visit National Geographic’s Freshwater website.

The Kolahoi glacier in the western Himalaya is known as Gwash Brani—”goddess of light”—to the millions of people in India and Pakistan who depend on its yearly run-off for survival.

“Kolahoi is our everything,” said Ashraf Mohammed Ganai, 24, a lean Kashmiri man who makes his living guiding scientific expeditions to Kolahoi. “Without her, we are lost.”

Because of climate change, these glaciers, and the people who rely on them, may now need some divine intervention.

(Read National Geographic magazine’s “The Big Melt.”)

Surrounded by the snow-capped peaks of the world’s tallest mountain range, the Kashmir region, disputed over by India and Pakistan, is home to thousands of glaciers. Until recently scientists had claimed they would be gone in just a few decades, mostly based on data from the United Nation’s (UN) 2007 Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change report.

To Read More…

Future Flower by Tonkin Liu

From de zeendzn_sq2_futureflower03hcannaliu

London architects Tonkin Liu have completed a wind-powered metal flower beside the River Mersey in England.

To Read More…

France: Climatology Row Raises a Storm

From Jane Marshall, University World News

Minister for Higher Education and Research Valérie Pécresse has ordered the French Academy of Sciences to organise a debate on climate change “as soon as possible” after more than 400 climatologists demanded she disown attacks made by sceptical scientists – including one of her predecessors.

The climatologists were responding in particular to accusations made by the outspoken former minister, geochemist Claude Allègre, and Vincent Courtillot, director of the Institut de Physique du Globe de Paris.

Allègre was Minister for Education, Research and Technology from 1997 until April 2000, when he was sacked by socialist Prime Minister Lionel Jospin after his proposed reforms and combative style had alienated schoolteachers, academics and researchers too far. Courtillot was his special adviser at the ministry for a time.

Allègre created a stir in 2006 when he declared his opinion that climate change was a natural process, and human activity had no impact on it. Now he has caused greater controversy with his new book L’Imposture climatique ou la fausse écologie (Climatic deceit or the false ecology), accusing climatologists of being “agents of a mafioso and totalitarian system” who were in a conspiracy to promote the idea that climate change was due to human behaviour.

To Read More…

An Ominous Warning on the Effects of Ocean Acidification

From Carl Zimmer, enviornment 360

A new study says the seas are acidifying ten times faster today than 55 million years ago when a mass extinction of marine species occurred. And, the study concludes, current changes in ocean chemistry due to the burning of fossil fuels may portend a new wave of die-offs.

The JOIDES Resolution looks like a bizarre hybrid of an oil rig and a cargo ship. It is, in fact, a research vessel that ocean scientists use to dig up sediment from the sea floor. In 2003, on a voyage to the southeastern Atlantic, scientists aboard the JOIDES Resolution brought up a particularly striking haul.

They had drilled down into sediment that had formed on the sea floor over the course of millions of years. The oldest sediment in the drill was white. It had been formed by the calcium carbonate shells of single-celled organisms — the same kind of material that makes up the White Cliffs of Dover. But when the scientists examined the sediment that had formed 55 million years ago, the color changed in a geological blink of an eye.

“In the middle of this white sediment, there’s this big plug of red clay,” says Andy Ridgwell, an earth scientist at the University of Bristol.

To Read More…

‘Cap and Trade’ Loses Its Standing as Energy Policy of Choice

From John M. Broder, New York Times

Less than a year ago, cap and trade was the policy of choice for tackling climate change. 26climate_337-395-articleinline1

Environmental groups and their foes in industry joined hands to embrace the approach, a market-driven system that sets a ceiling on global warming pollution while allowing companies to trade permits to meet it. President Obama praised it by name in his first budget, and the authors of the House climate and energy bill passed last June largely built their measure around it.

Today, the concept is in wide disrepute, with opponents effectively branding it “cap and tax,” and Tea Party followers using it as a symbol of much of what they say is wrong with Washington.

Mr. Obama dropped all mention of cap and trade from his current budget. And the sponsors of a Senate climate bill likely to be introduced in April, now that Congress is moving past health care, dare not speak its name.

To Read More…