Monthly Archive for December, 2009

J.S Pandey: Climate Change, Food Security and Energy Alternatives

cjgif

Dr J.S. Pandey was a Plenary Speaker at the 2009 Conference. Dr. Pandey has been the Deputy Director & Science Secretary at the National Environmental Engineering Research Institute in Nagpur, India since May 1987.

Dr Pandey’s paper  Inter-disciplinarity of Issues Connected with Climate Change, Food Security and Energy Alternatives has been published as part of The International Journal of Climate Change: Impacts and Responses.

Abstract: In association with the impact on forests, the major impacts of climate change in India would be on the land-surface and ground water hydrology and the agricultural food-production. The critical ecological challenge in future will be whether the available natural resources are sufficiently available to support food production as well as to generate ecosystem services. There already is a significant pressure on ecosystems because of continuously increasing population and extensive land use changes. Sustainable use of land and water resources requires that these scarce resources be appropriately allocated among various competing human activities. World-over, there is a realization now that climate change research calls for a multi-disciplinary and integrated approach. Moreover, it becomes important that at local and regional scales mechanisms of GHG-interactions with water, light, nutrients and temperature should be investigated, and the effects integrated in such a fashion as to quantify the cumulative impact of GHG- increase. This article, inter alia, focuses on the above-mentioned issues and delineates some of the activities related to the research being carried out in India. Some of the worth-mentioning recent research activities in India pertain to the quantification of environmental water demand (EWD), methane emissions from hydroelectric reservoirs, investigations into the inter-dependencies between bio-geochemical cycling and climatic perturbations, linkages between food-crisis, ecological foot-printing, ecological risk assessment and ecological economics.

Climate Change Journal, Volume 1, Number 4

The final issue of  The International Journal of Climate Change: Impacts and Responses has now been published.

Some of the papers included in Volume 1, Number 4:

Climate Journal, Volume 1, Number 4 now available

The final issue of the new Journal, The International Journal of Climate Change: Impacts and Responses, has now been published.

Some of the papers included in Volume 1, Number 4:

No Slowdown of Global Warming, Agency Says

From Andrew C. Revkin and James Kanter, The New York Times.

The decade of 2000 to 2009 appears to be the warmest one in the modern record, the World Meteorological Organization reported in a new analysis on Tuesday.

The announcement is likely to be viewed as a rejoinder to a renewed challenge from skeptics to the scientific evidence for global warming, as international negotiators here seek to devise a global response to climate change.articlelarge1

The period from 2000 through 2009 has been “warmer than the 1990s, which were warmer than the 1980s, and so on,” Michel Jarraud, the secretary general of the international weather agency, said at a news conference here.

To Read More…

Prakash Rao: Glacial Melt and Climate Change in the Himalayas

cjgif

Dr. Prakash Rao was a Plenary Speaker at the 2009 Conference. Dr Rao has 25 years of experience in the field of biological conservation and ecology related subjects in India and overseas.

Dr Rao’s paper  Glacial Melt and Climate Change in the Himalayas: Building Adaptive Strategies for the Future has been published as part of The International Journal of Climate Change: Impacts and Responses. The paper is by Prakash Rao, Gopala Areendran and Rajesh Kumar.

AbstractAccording to the recent IPCC report, the mean global surface temperature has increased by 0.74C over the last 100 years (1906-2005). Eleven of the twelve warmest years have been recorded in the past twelve years. The findings of the IPCC Assessment Report (2007) suggest that there has been a significant decline in the mountain glaciers and snow cover, which has contributed to the increased sea levels. From 1961 to 2003, the global mean sea level rose by 1.8 (+0.5) mm per year and the the global temperature of the oceans increased by 0.10oC from surface to depth of 700m from 1961- 2003 and 80% of the heat added to the climate system is being absorbed by the ocean. Other long term climatic changes that have been observed include extreme droughts, intensity of tropical cyclones, changes in the salinity of the ocean and wind patterns. In the later half of 20th century, a threefold increase in the rate of retreat has been observed in Himalayan Glaciers with an increased rate of retreat since advent of industrialisation . There are definite linkages seen with excessive increments in earth’s average global surface temperature as brought by various studies around the world.

Lies and the Lying Lies about Science, and Also, the Lies

From firedoglake

It should be bizarre, but is in fact grimly typical, how the whole phony “climate-gate-scandal” has played out so far. Hundreds of emails between climate scientists were hacked — stolen — from servers at East Anglia University. The stolen materials were then misrepresented, distorted, and lied about, and the scientists involved abused, insulted, and accused of everything from deliberate fraud to acting as the willing dupes of the shadowy liberal-fascist “global warming industry.”

The bizarre part is that the only people being asked to Seriously Question Their Motives and Practices, or who are facing scrutiny for what they did, are the climate scientists who just got robbed, even though there is absolutely no evidence whatsoever that they have actually done anything clearly unethical. (The worst bit is the suggestion as to deleting emails, something that everyone concedes is pretty bad and nobody is defending, though there’s no proof anything was ever deleted.) More important, nothing in all this nonsense even approaches a challenge to the science that shows the reality of global climate change, at least to a reasonable person.

To Read More…

Climate Change Journal Volume 1 now complete

climate-211x300

The first volume of  The International Journal of Climate Change: Impacts and Responses, is now complete.

The volume comprises four separate issues:

The second volume is now in production.

Copenhagen Dispute Over IP

From Leah Germain, University World News.

Proposals from China and India for the Copenhagen climate change conference that patent protection should be weakened for green inventions have generated significant concerns in universities, colleges and research centres.

Pro-intellectual property activists argue that a patent for their invention could mean the difference between a marketable, successful product and an interesting idea. Intellectual property rights or IPR and patent protection laws are coveted since they protect an innovator’s right to their hard work.

But developing country governments have noted that licences to reproduce a product can be expensive. China and India, along with 77 other developing countries, have set out a proposal for discussion at Copenhagen to liberalise global intellectual property rights for new innovations designed to reduce carbon emissions.

To Read More…

The Hacked Climate Change Emails: What They Do And Don’t Show

climategate-cropped-proto-custom_21

From Zachary Roth, TPM.

So, what to make of those emails, stolen from a top climate research center in Britain, that conservatives are excitedly touting to argue that the science of climate change is fatally flawed?

The Wall Street Journal’s Daniel Henninger calls the episode “an epochal event” that shows “science is dying.” But underneath the bombast, the key question is whether the emails — hacked from the University of East Anglia’s Climate Research Unit (CRU), and indexed here — actually undermine the case, now settled, that man-made warming is happening. And despite the claims of the New York Post, among others, they don’t come close to doing so.

Exhibit A for conservatives has been the revelation in the emails that, back in the 1980s, CRU discarded a set of data on raw surface temperature. The Post argues that that means “it’s now impossible to check the CRU research,” and adds “So much for settling questions and resolving debates with science.”

To Read More…

Copenhagen Climate Change Conference: ‘Fourteen Days to Seal History’s Judgment on This Generation’

From The Guardian

This editorial calling for action from world leaders on climate change is published today by 56 newspapers around the world in 20 languages.

Today 56 newspapers in 45 countries take the unprecedented step of speaking with one voice through a common editorial. We do so because humanity faces a profound emergency.

Unless we combine to take decisive action, climate change will ravage our planet, and with it our prosperity and security. The dangers have been becoming apparent for a generation. Now the facts have started to speak: 11 of the past 14 years have been the warmest on record, the Arctic ice-cap is melting and last year’s inflamed oil and food prices provide a foretaste of future havoc. In scientific journals the question is no longer whether humans are to blame, but how little time we have got left to limit the damage. Yet so far the world’s response has been feeble and half-hearted.

To Read More…

Climate Breakthrough: Obama and China Commit to Change

obama-jintao1

From Mark Hertsgaard, Vanity Fair.

You wouldn’t know it from the coverage in the mainstream media, but last week may go down as a turning point in the history of the climate crisis. After months of putting health care first, President Obama finally stepped up the plate and, amazingly, secured what has long been the Holy Grail of climate diplomacy: a U.S.-China climate deal. Speaking in Beijing on November 17 alongside Chinese president Hu Jintao, Obama said he hoped the U.S.-China accord would “rally the world” toward solutions at the U.N. climate summit in Copenhagen, December 7 to 18. After months of Obama’s aides lowering expectations for Copenhagen, and even suggesting that he would not attend the summit, the president signaled that climate change is a top priority and that he is prepared to spend real political capital to achieve a breakthrough, both in Copenhagen and on Capitol Hill.

To Read More…

Global Warming is Still the Most Important Environmental Issue

Poll by Roy Morgan Research

The most important environmental issues facing the World today are Global warming related issues (52%, down 1% from May 2009), ahead of Pollution (19%, down 5%), Water management and Drought (19%, up 6%) and Depletion of Resources (12%, down 5%).These are the results of a recent telephone Roy Morgan Survey on the most important environmental issues facing the World and Australia conducted in November 2009.

The most important environmental issue facing Australia today is Water management & Drought (45%, up 9%) ahead of Global warming related issues (34%, up 7%), Natural disasters (29%, up 9%) and Pollution issues (16%, down 3%).

World Environmental Issues

The precise environmental issues to increase since May this year are led by Climate change (21%, up 6%), now only just behind Global warming (23%, down 1%), Water conservation, Water management (11%, up 3%), Drought (8%, up 4%) and Famine (4%, up 3%).

Australian Environmental Issues

Since May several related environmental issues have increased significantly led by Water conservation, Water management (25%, up 5%), Drought (23%, up 7%), Climate change (16%, up 9%) and Bushfires (9%, up 5%).

When asked specifically about Global warming and the associated problems, 34% (up 11%) of Australians mentioned Rising sea levels, 27% (down 3%) cited Climate change, 17% (down 2%) said the Melting of polar ice caps and 13% (up 4%) mentioned the Greenhouse effect, Heating up of planet, Thermal blanket as a problem related to Global warming.

A slightly reduced majority of Australians aged 14+ (57%, down 1%) believe “If we don’t act now it will be too late” in relation to Global warming compared to 26% (unchanged) that say about Global warming that “Concerns are exaggerated.”

Slightly more Australians (13%, up 1%) say about Global warming that “It is already too late” while just 4% (unchanged) can’t say.

To Read More…

Businesses in U.S. Brace for New Rules on Emissions

articlelargeBy Jad Mouawad, in The New York Times.

The nation’s corporations have long been bracing for the day when they would be required to carry out sharp cuts in the emissions that cause global warming. That day seemed to move a bit closer on Wednesday, when President Obama outlined a national target for such reductions.

Much of corporate America has already been thinking about how to comply. Many businesses concluded years ago that such limits were inevitable, and they have been calling on Congress to define the exact rules they will need to follow.

Already, many companies are recording their emissions and analyzing the results. Some have set voluntary targets for reductions and are claiming substantial progress in meeting them. Sustainability — a notion mostly heard in environmental circles only a decade ago — has become a mainstream idea to which some companies are committed and many are paying lip service.

Major corporations, including General Electric, the Ford Motor Company and PepsiCo, have teamed up with environmental groups to set up the United States Climate Action Partnership, a wide-ranging coalition trying to find ways to cut emissions throughout the economy.

To read more…

Fuelling Fears: A Uranium Shortage Could Derail Plans to Go Nuclear to Cut Carbon Emissions

climateFrom Economist.com

There is an awesome amount of energy tied up in an atom of uranium. Because of that, projections of the price of nuclear power tend to focus on the cost of building the plant rather than that of fuelling it. But proponents of nuclear energy—who argue, correctly, that such plants emit little carbon dioxide—would do well to remember that, like coal and oil, uranium is a finite resource.

Some 60% of the 66,500 tonnes of uranium needed to fuel the world’s existing nuclear power plants is dug fresh from the ground each year. The remaining 40% comes from so-called secondary sources, in the form of recycled fuel or redundant nuclear warheads. The International Atomic Energy Agency, which is a United Nations body, and the Nuclear Energy Agency, which was formed by the rich countries that are members of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, both reckon that, at present rates, these secondary sources will be exhausted within the next decade or so.

To Read More…